Skip to Main Content
Let's Talk
Menu Close
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Chiller Plant Optimization | Optimum Energy Case Study
Case Study
Healthcare · Chilled Water Optimization

Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Chiller Plant Optimization

OptimumLOOP® delivers operational efficiencies and beats expected cost savings

LocationHershey, PA
IndustryHealthcare
Years with Optimum10
$300,000
Annual Operations Cost Savings
3,220 Tons
CO₂ Reduction Per Year
$416,000
One-Time Utility Incentive
4.3 YRS
ROI
Overview

Beating Projections on a Large, Efficient Campus

Since 2009, the Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center has been implementing a multiphase energy efficiency program. Six years into the program, Kevin Kanoff, the center’s campus energy engineer, knew the chiller plants were efficient — but believed they could be improved.

Johnson Controls, the center’s lead vendor, brought in Optimum Energy to perform an engineering site assessment (ESA), which proved him correct: optimizing the chiller plants across the campus would deliver significant energy savings. After Optimum Energy completed the installation of its OptiCx® platform and OptimumLOOP® in June 2016, the center’s 12 chillers were running at peak efficiency, saving electricity costs, using less water, and reducing carbon emissions.

Annual energy savings were found to be almost 4.16 GWh/year — roughly 1 GWh more than the original projection of 3.4 GWh — and campus energy intensity dropped 4 percent, bringing the campuswide reduction to 24 percent over 2009 levels.

Plant Details

Three Plants. One Integrated System.

Central Plant

Chillers8 chillers
Storage1.4M gallon chilled-water storage tank
Annual Energy~112,000,000 kWh electricity
Natural Gas573,000 MMBtu/year

Satellite Plants

Configuration2 plants × 2 chillers each
Total Chillers4 (plus 8 in central = 12 total)
Total Capacity14,200 tons
Ton Hours24.8 million ton-hours
The Challenge

Optimizing a Large, Already Efficient Plant

The previous phases of the energy efficiency initiative had already reduced campus energy intensity by 20 percent. Kanoff had to find a way to squeeze out additional efficiencies from a system that was already considered highly optimized.

Scale & Complexity

Three chiller plants spanning 2.6 million sq ft, serving 1.2 million patients and 10,000 employees — with a central plant, a 1.4 million gallon chilled-water storage tank, and two satellite plants all requiring coordinated optimization.

Already 20% More Efficient

Prior energy efficiency phases had already delivered a 20% reduction in campus energy intensity. Finding meaningful additional savings required a holistic, real-time system-wide approach that went beyond what manual operations could achieve.

Critical Patient Environment

Any changes to chiller operations had to be completely seamless. Critical patient care areas could not be compromised during implementation — reliability was non-negotiable across all three plants simultaneously.

Manual Operations Without Full Visibility

Facility staff monitored and controlled chillers manually without a complete picture of the integrated system. Decisions were made per-shift, creating inconsistencies and leaving efficiency gains on the table around the clock.

Solution

True Optimization®: Holistic Relational Control

Optimum Energy’s OptimumLOOP® relational control optimizes the plant holistically. It automatically stages all the chillers and the chilled-water storage tank as an integrated whole, choosing the best option based on equipment efficiency and demand for cooling. The software continuously collects data about plant operations, outside conditions, and hundreds of other parameters, then calculates how to operate for peak efficiency and adjusts set points of pumps, fans, and other components in real time.

The combination of OptimumLOOP® with the data analytics of the OptiCx® platform is what Optimum Energy calls True Optimization®. Johnson Controls paved the way by installing variable-speed drives on pumps and fans, adding power meters and sensors, and fully automating the plant before OptimumLOOP® was deployed.

The implementation at all three plants went smoothly. “From a building environment perspective, the system went through start-up seamlessly. Critical patient areas were not compromised,” says Kanoff. “Now they’re able to accomplish more, managing and operating the entire plant without the old white-knuckle approach.”

Results

Energy and Cost Savings Beyond Expectations

$300,000

Annual Cost Savings

vs. $261,000 originally projected — exceeding expectations by nearly $40,000/year

4.16 GWh

Annual Energy Savings

vs. 3.4 GWh projected — nearly 1 GWh more than expected, verified by the electric utility

$416,000

One-Time Utility Incentive

Earned from the electric utility at project completion as a bonus incentive

7M+ lbs

CO₂ Emissions Saved

Initial verified CO₂ reductions — 3,220 tons/year ongoing carbon footprint reduction

1.44M+ gal

Annual Water Savings

More than 1.44 million gallons of water saved per year from reduced energy consumption

24%

Campuswide Energy Reduction

Total energy intensity reduction over 2009 levels — 4% added by this optimization project alone

Project Benefits

Beyond Energy: Operational Gains

Energy savings exceeding projections
Cost savings
CO₂ emissions reduction
Water savings
Utility incentive earned
Automated plant operations
Improved system visibility
Seamless patient environment
Through this project, we are more aware of energy efficiency and savings. It’s helping the team see the bigger picture — we’re not just providing chilled water, but we’re doing it as efficiently as possible and, ultimately, saving money.
— Kevin Kanoff, Campus Energy Engineer, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center
Bottom Line

Savings That Exceeded Every Projection.

The Hershey Medical Center project demonstrates what’s possible when a large healthcare campus commits to continuous optimization — even after years of efficiency gains. By deploying OptimumLOOP® and OptiCx® across three interconnected chiller plants as an integrated whole, Hershey achieved nearly 1 GWh more in annual savings than projected, earned a $416,000 utility incentive, and gave its operations team a new level of visibility and control.

“We are more aware of energy efficiency and savings,” says Kanoff. “It’s helping the team see the bigger picture.” With campuswide energy intensity now 24% below 2009 levels — and still improving — the Hershey Medical Center has set a new standard for large-scale healthcare energy optimization.