Skip to Main Content
Let's Talk
Menu Close
Georgia Institute of Technology Chiller Plant Optimization | Optimum Energy Case Study
Case Study
Higher Education · Chilled Water Optimization

Georgia Institute of Technology Chiller Plant Optimization

HVAC optimization reaps savings and insights into daily plant operations

LocationAtlanta, GA
IndustryHigher Education
Years with Optimum10+
$459,000
Annual Operations Cost Savings
$272,000
Year 1 Operations Cost Savings
34.6%
Plant Efficiency Improvement
5 YRS
ROI
Overview

A Radical Change to Plant Operations

In 2016, Georgia Institute of Technology received permission from the state of Georgia to enter into a Guaranteed Energy Savings Performance Contract (GESPC) and receive a $7.7 million loan—as long as the project could pay for itself within seven years. The team determined that improving the efficiency of the university’s two chiller plants would make the greatest impact.

Optimum Energy performed a rigorous audit, then scoped a comprehensive project: changing the pumping strategy, replacing two chillers, adding state-of-the-art upgrades, and installing OptimumLOOP® and the OptiCx® platform. On the first day, energy consumption dropped from 1.0 kW/ton to 0.65 kW/ton across the combined 28,152 tons of cooling capacity.

Georgia Tech anticipates saving nearly $1.5 million a year in energy costs, and efficiency is expected to continue improving as operations expand.

Plant Details

Two Plants. One Integrated Solution.

10th Street Plant (North Campus)

Cooling Capacity16,196 tons
Chillers7
Condenser Water Pumps7
Cooling Towers7
Free-Cooling Heat Exchanger1
Chilled Water Production30,245,599 ton-hours
Pre-Optimization0.912 kW/ton
Post-Optimization0.702 kW/ton

Holland Plant (South Campus)

Cooling Capacity11,956 tons
Chillers7
Condenser Water Pumps7
Cooling Towers3
Chilled Water Production23,293,649 ton-hours
Pre-Optimization1.013 kW/ton
Post-Optimization0.714 kW/ton
The Challenge

Fiscal Commitment & Radical Change

Alexander had to prove to the state of Georgia that the project would improve facility efficiency and provide enough savings to repay the loan—while finding a solution provider that would guarantee the savings.

Guaranteed Savings Requirement

The GESPC required a provider willing to contractually guarantee energy and cost savings sufficient to repay a $7.7M state loan within seven years. After a three-month investment-grade audit, Optimum Energy and Johnson Controls made that commitment.

Major Mechanical Upgrades Required

The audit showed optimization would deliver required savings but necessitate major changes: replacing two old chillers with one larger high-efficiency unit, installing VFDs on 26 motors, and reconfiguring from primary-secondary to variable primary pumping.

Rigorous Network Security

“We have an absolute rule that nothing whatsoever touches the plant system.” Optimum developed a secure VPN-protected solution where data passes through loggers every 5 minutes—enabling real-time monitoring without direct network access.

Pumping Scheme Reconfiguration

Changing from primary-secondary to variable primary pumping raised concerns about eliminating a pump set. Optimum devised a bypass solution leaving primary pumps in place, giving Georgia Tech the flexibility to restore them if needed.

Results & Highlights

Cutting Energy Consumption by a Third

$1.5M/yr

Projected Annual Utility Cost Savings

Anticipated annual savings in energy costs across both plants

17.5M kWh

Annual Electrical Energy Savings

More than a third cut from campus energy consumption

25,818 kW

Annual Electrical Demand Reduction

Peak electrical demand reduction across both chiller plants

31M lbs

Annual CO₂ Emissions Reduction

CO₂ emissions savings per year at the chiller plants

$271,827

Annual Operational Cost Savings

Additional savings in operational costs beyond utility bills

Day 1

Immediate Results

Energy dropped from 1.0 to 0.65 kW/ton on the very first day of operation

By keeping the equipment operating at maximum efficiency, we’re saving money—and that’s what the optimization project is really about. I expect the plants to continue to improve and perform at a more efficient level than today. As we add more research buildings, we’ll definitely start off with optimization.
— Donald P. Alexander, P.E., Facilities Design & Construction Institute Engineer, Georgia Tech
Bottom Line

Nothing to Lose. Everything to Gain.

“This project gave us the opportunity to make a radical change to our chiller plant operations that would reduce the cost of chilled water production and benefit the entire campus,” said Alexander. “Because the vendor had to guarantee the savings, we had nothing to lose.”

Georgia Tech’s GESPC model—with contractually guaranteed savings and an investment-grade audit—demonstrates how higher education institutions can tackle large-scale energy optimization with no financial risk, while gaining the operational insights and efficiency gains that pay dividends for decades.